Up In Consulting

Elevate your writing and move up in your career

Up In Consulting
  • About
  • Elevate
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • FAQs

Can a Checklist Make You a Better Writer? 

  • By Jane
  • August 17, 2016
  • ProductivityWriting Tips
  • 0 Comments
Can a Checklist Make You a Better Writer? 

 

I picked up The Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande planning to read it for insights into working with my time management clients. What I found upon reading, however, is much to think about for academic writing and editing.  In a nutshell, Gawande argues in this book that checklists are one way we make sense of the work that goes into solving complicated and complex problems. Considering the challenges of successfully writing academic manuscripts, I’d like to explore whether checklists can be used across different fields, as Gawande believes they can be.

Gawande identifies checklists as essential for managing vast amounts of knowledge, stating that “they are quick and simple tools aimed to buttress the skills of expert professionals” (128).  In his opinion, it’s not necessarily a lack of knowledge that is the problem. Instead, it’s the inability to use that knowledge appropriately, especially in complex, high-stress situations such as building skyscrapers, flying an airplane or performing surgery.

The conclusion of the book is that of course the checklists work. Once the checklists are adapted in operating rooms, complications and fatalities decrease. The checklists themselves are relatively simple, asking the staff to confirm the patient has received antibiotics and make sure the appropriate location on the patient’s body is marked for surgery, for instance. Basic stuff that should be happening in every operating room no matter the location of the hospital or the procedure being performed.

As I mention above, Gawande is interested in experts’ use of checklists. What is more pertinent for the discussion on this blog, however, is the value of standardization. We talk about habits and routines when it comes to developing a writing practice, but we rarely talk about habits and routines in relation to the substance of our writing.

Can such a process be applicable to writing? Perhaps there isn’t one good way to write a manuscript. But, are there certain characteristics that all good manuscripts share? A checklist might be a step towards identifying what those characteristics are. It seems to be the case that bad manuscripts are bad in similar ways. One journal editor suggests that the articles he rejects all exhibit a similar set of problems. The question, then, is this: with the high rates of rejection, it’s obvious that there is much room for improvement in the writing of journal articles. But can the writing of these manuscripts be standardized in some way that will lead to improvement? If so, what would this standardization look like? Further, can you have any level of standardization and still preserve the voice of the author, and what is unique about each manuscript?

I don’t think there is an easy answer to this question. For one thing, there is very little consensus when it comes to identifying “good” writing. This is probably best illustrated by the divergence you’ll find in reviewers’ comments on a single manuscript. Additionally, each discipline has it’s own way of doing things. Of course, there is also the belief that our work is too iterative, subjective, complex or what have you, “It somehow feels beneath us to use a checklist, an embarrassment that runs counter to deeply held beliefs about how the truly great among use — those we aspire to be — handle situations of high stakes and complexity.” (173). We just might think we’re too good for a checklist.

Perhaps the reason why there is so little teaching of writing at the graduate level if because we don’t standardize writing in any way. After all, what is teaching if not standardization, especially at the introductory level? If a set of best practices around writing can’t be identified or agreed upon, then what is there to teach? Yet, leaving each writer to figure it out on their own has not proved successful.

What do you think? Would standardization compromise or improve the writing process? Do you think that academic writers are good at not only identifying problematic writing, but also discussing why it’s problematic and how to improve it?

Share

Related Posts

Emotional Labor and Writing

September 30, 2020

Three Reasons Your Academic Manuscript is Unwieldy

July 1, 2020

Simple Productivity Is Open for Enrollment

June 25, 2020

Mastering Basic Productivity Techniques

June 19, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Archives

  • January 2021
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014

Categories

  • Asking For Help
  • Book Reviews
  • Book Writing
  • Editing
  • From Course Paper To Article
  • general-testimonial
  • Goal setting
  • Impostor Syndrome
  • Journal Articles
  • Monday Motivation
  • Overcoming Barriers
  • Planning
  • Productivity
  • productivity-testimonial
  • Quick Tips
  • Revising
  • Saying No
  • Services
  • Stress
  • Uncategorized
  • Writing Tips

Meta

  • Entries RSS
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Productivity
  • Can a Checklist Make You a Better Writer? 

Let’s get writing.

Subscribe to get the latest writing and productivity tips. Like happy mail for your planner.

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

© 2021 Up In Consulting

  • Home
  • About
  • Elevate
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Frequently Asked Questions