Up In Consulting

Elevate your writing and move up in your career

Up In Consulting
  • About
  • Elevate
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • FAQs

Inside the Mind of Your Editor

  • By Jane
  • February 20, 2018
  • Editing
  • 0 Comments
Inside the Mind of Your Editor

Have you ever considered working with an editor and then talked yourself out of it? Perhaps you said something to yourself like, “I don’t need one more person to tell me what’s wrong with this article,” or “I’ll get all the comments I need during the revise and resubmit process.” In both instances, you may be trying to shield yourself from what you consider to be unnecessary, and perhaps mean-spirited judgment.

 

Writers seek my services because they want help. This does not, however, mean I assume they’re a bad writer. I’ve written about the false relationship between being a “bad” writer and seeking help here and here. I’ve also written about what I do during the editing process. In this post, I am going to focus on how I think about the editing process.

 

What goes through an editor’s mind while they’re editing?

 

I like to joke with my clients that I’m like Reviewer 2, but not an asshole. But, there is another, even more important distinction between an editor and a reviewer. My job is not to render a final judgment concerning whether your manuscript should be placed in a journal or published by a press. Instead, my job is to work with you to bring your manuscript closer to completion, no matter what stage it’s currently at.

 

I generally evaluate my clients’ work based on my assessment of how far it is from completion. This helps me determine two important things: what level of editorial intervention is needed, and what the next step will be for the author. It also means that I don’t look at any author’s writing as essentially bad, or ever believe that an editorial intervention would be futile.

 

Do editors think about writing as good or bad?

 

I don’t use this distinction. I think it’s lazy, and that we use it to impugn writers’ abilities. “Good” and “bad” have a finality to them – that once you are identified as one or the other there is no opportunity for you to change. That’s simply not true. I do, however, believe that writers have strengths and weaknesses. I also believe this is true of athletes, musicians, physicians, etc – basically any person with a skill set. What I don’t believe is that saying a writer has a weakness means I am making a normative evaluation of their worth as a writer. What I find most rewarding about working with clients on a long-term basis across multiple writing projects is that I can identify those writing quirks and help the writer to also identify them and then remedy them. This is an iterative process.

 

I also believe that for developmental editing, there is an enormous amount of subjectivity in identifying “good” or “bad” writing. In copyediting, an editor can identify grammatical errors and quickly resolve them. There are rules for grammar and spelling that are, for the most part, relatively straightforward. A copyeditor may also have rules from a journal or publisher (called house style) that they must abide by when editing. A copyeditor’s job is not always limited to correcting grammar, but for that portion of the job, there is clear guidance. For developmental editing, I believe there is more than one way to write a manuscript that is publishable. Similarly, there is more than one way to write elegant prose or to develop a compelling argument. I’m sure we can all think of individual pieces of writing that we enjoy and recognize that they might have some things in common but perhaps not that much.

 

But to return to my point about bringing projects closer to completion, I think that manuscripts people would identify as “bad” I simply consider not yet ready. Just as you wouldn’t say that flour, water, and yeast mixed together in a bowl is a bad loaf of bread, I wouldn’t say that a piece of writing that lands on my desk is a bad manuscript. Rather, it needs more work. Unfortunately, as a community academics value revision about as much as they talk about it (which is very little). We’re also trained to be intensely critical, which means we’re more likely to denounce a piece of writing as bad – THE END – than to think about how it could be revised.

 

I’m an editor, but I was first a tenure-track professor and before that a graduate student. Before that, I was an undergrad at the University of Chicago. So to say that I’ve had to unlearn the impulse to harshly critique other people’s work would be an understatement. My job as an editor is (obviously) not to alienate my clients, or to make them feel bad about their work. Nor is it to prove my intellectual superiority. It’s to help you as a writer create work that you are proud of, that is publishable.

 

I think one reason that writers are anxious about working with an editor is that they project their own insecurities about their writing onto the editor. We’re often our own worst critics, and we expect that the readers of our work will be similarly harsh towards our writing. This isn’t always true. If you’d like to change your attitude towards your writing, or how you critique your colleagues’ writing, then please download my list of 3 Mindset Shifts to Change How You Evaluate Your Writing. The list is simple and will help you to reframe your thoughts about writing. You’ll also approach drafts with more empathy.

Thanks to Jen Polk (@FromPhDtoLife), Margy Thomas (@ScholarShape), and Michelle Dionne Thompson (@mdionnethompson) for a lively Twitter discussion that motivated me to write this post.

 

                                                        

Share

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Archives

  • October 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014

Categories

  • Academic Writing
  • Asking For Help
  • Book Reviews
  • Book Writing
  • Editing
  • From Course Paper To Article
  • general-testimonial
  • Goal setting
  • Impostor Syndrome
  • Journal Articles
  • Monday Motivation
  • Overcoming Barriers
  • Planning
  • Productivity
  • productivity-testimonial
  • Quick Tips
  • Revising
  • Saying No
  • Services
  • Stress
  • Uncategorized
  • Writing Tips

Meta

  • Entries RSS
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Editing
  • Inside the Mind of Your Editor

Let’s get writing.

Subscribe to get the latest writing and productivity tips. Like happy mail for your planner.

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

© 2023 Up In Consulting

  • Home
  • About
  • Elevate
  • Testimonials
  • Blog